Shotbeak.com
msgbartop
On Air: Student, aspiring web entrepreneur and musician.
msgbarbottom

22 Aug 09 Is my knowledge being reduced to pointers?

Tags: , ,

After studying for a test this past week, I reaffirmed a theory of mine. It’s not technically a theory. It is already happening, and I think most people can agree.

I have to remember about 300 pages for a test. I’ve realised how I remember the knowledge. I remember where the information and even sometimes how the data was structured on the page, but I couldn’t remember the details. To me, it feels like the pointers to memory that are used in computers.

I feel that our generation, driven by the internet (Google and Wikipedia) where we have a wealth of information at our fingertips start to think about our knowledge in a different way. We don’t make the effort to remember all the data, but rather only remember where to get it, once we need it.

So in essence, my knowledge is being reduced to a bank of pointers of which Google and Wikipedia are the most important (Wolfram to a lesser extent).

In the past, it could’ve existed to a lesser extent, ie just go to the library to get your information, but the effort required was much greater. To me it is apparent that it is becoming more profound.

Is it good or bad? I’d say, it’s a natural progression for the merging of humans and technology. I’m no expert on “brain power”, but it seems obvious that we don’t to spend too much time to remember it all, but rather spending time on applying our knowledge.

Become a share-bear:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • muti
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
Similar Posts:
  • andreinafrica
    Not to burst your bubble one little bit, but what you're experiencing has been around longer than the Internet or Google. Many disciplines have, in recognition of the sheer volume of data available, rewarded the ability to find data, more than the ability to memorise it.

    Before the widespread use of PC's, practitioners of engineering, medicine and law for example would have vast tomes of data available, ready to be looked up and used in a particular project. When I wrote M+3 engineering exams at Technikon in the early 80's (when an HP-41C was considered more computer than anyone would EVAH need :)) some of the exams were already open-book exams. You were required to know how to research and apply the solutions to problems, not attempt to memorise them all.
    And no, *those* were not the easy exams :)

    I do agree with you though, is that as the sum of knowledge and the sea of data that is required to be mastered at earlier and earlier stages of education, increases, the style of problem solving is changing from: "just remember ALL of this" to: "these are the tools, I've taught you to use them, keep them in this box until you need them" and that *that* style is being taught earlier and earlier.

    Your learning curve and this style curve, have clearly just intersected...:))


    and is more a indicator of the level of study that you have achieved, rather than
  • Thanks for the comment.

    I thought it might be so. :)
  • colinsyme
    A famous millionaire who had no formal education was asked how he was able to run his large company when he had no qualifications. He said,"If something came up that was over my head,---see that phone, l'll use it and get the answer in two minutes."
blog comments powered by Disqus